-----
"How is it that in a world where all that is real is a particular and individual thing, the human mind is able to distribute the manifold of reality into classes, in which particular things are contained?"
"Who gets to define gots the power."
kategoreo - English: to charge with; accuse. Latin: predicament
"What's in a name? Plenty!"
"By a name
I know not how to tell thee who I am:
My name, dear saint, is hateful to myself,
Because it is an enemy to thee;
Had I it written, I would tear the word."
-----
What do we know when we know someone's name? Identity is one thing, but identification is another.
"Who do you say I am?"
"Say my name, say my name..."
"Smile when you say that, pardner!"
"And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof. And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field..."
My take on this naming business is that Adam gave each creature a name *individually* rather than according to kind or class. Adam gave them each their very own name, and their name was a gift as much as their relationship/connection with Adam was gift. The naming came out of Adam's priestly role of offering up each creature with love and delight. It was a different order of power. Each was named, *but not defined*. Not reduced to a word.
Not like we like to do with, say, clams. Poor clams. Not exactly an onomatopoetic identification. The ID "clam" hardly does clam-ness justice, does it. But we think we know clams. Seen one clam, seen them all. Poor clams, did I say? No, poor us. We seldom see actual individual clams. We have no names for individual clams. Even when we do the names miss the point. You know, like, "Let me introduce you to my pet clam, Clem! Say 'hi' to the folks, Clem!" His Clem-ness says, "Hi, dearies. I don'a gotsa no lira, so do'na put yur tax on'a me! Just enjoy me as I am in all'a my glory, thank a'you!"
I have to think back then the analogical correspondence between the word and the thing itself was a lot tighter; a lot more intimate. The name intimated so much more of the named. And the namer. Not like now.
Could we get that back? The whole creation groans for it, I think. I know I do. Don't you?
What's in a name? Plenty. A clam by any other name would still smell pretty fishy.
"And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch."
Who gave the disciples their new name, anyway? Did the disciples name themselves? Or did the Antiochian community get to name them? I think others named them, and it stuck. So we're stuck with it too?
What's identification for, anyway? Cognitive shorthand? What is the relationship/connection between what they were called and who they were? Which defined which? And what *was* the definition of Christian, then? Whose was it? What did that word/name "Christian" mean? Believer/follower of Christ? A Christ-one? Did the name do the subject justice? As a genus? As a specie? As an individual? As a family? Did anyone do the name justice? Has anyone?
So what does "Christian" mean now? A believer/follower of Jesus? What's the defining characteristic, now, that qualifies someone for that name/title these days? These post-Chalcedon, post-Dort, post-Trent, post-Chicago, post-modern days? Who gets to say? Who knows? And what difference does it make, anymore? And for whose sake?
A Christian by any other name would still not smell like a clam. Or a rose, for that matter. What *does* a Christian smell like, anyway? Teen Spirit?
Who I am is one thing. *Whose* I am is another. Whose *you* think I am is yet another. Who do you say that I am? Who do I smell like to you? Are you sure you got a good whiff? Here... come a little closer... wait, not too close. Yeah... come closer a little further away. Because it matters to me. Because you matter.
Say my name, say my name... You priest me. One way or the other. It's your calling. And I you. It's our mutual oblation, our heave offering on the one hand and our thank offering on the other, unto the Name that is above every name who calls us each by name, and gives us his own name (whatever that means), whose Name is as ointment poured forth. Like the rest of us. We all matter.
"To be, or not to be?"
To be? Or to do?
Do-be do-be do...
Just don't call me late for dinner. It smells very good. So do you.
Fe-fi-fo-fum...
Until the day when the Accuser is cast down...
Got glue?
Always, all ways yours,
~His Ricky-ness
9 comments:
I like pastiche. Beethoven did it... Chopin.
That God creates orders as well as individuals is to me just one more layer of multiplicity and exuberance.
A clam is not a zebra. We have noticed the fact and ponder it. I enjoy knowing there are finches and rhinoceroses. I’ve even known and named a few. I do get the impression from the bible text, though, that “You’re Fido, you’re Dances With Wolves, you’re Monkey Boy” is pretty close to what went down, lol.
“and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof. And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field..."
But you know the story. When boy loses girl, the whole world is a blustery day. Now this naming thing… this cloud of words, has developed a serpentine complexity. What do words reveal, and what do they strangle and conceal? Didn’t Marshall Mcluhan liken the discovery of the alphabet to the sewing of “dragon’s teeth” ?
So the several and singular beauties of classes, genera, families and pets, are up for grabs. Quasi-angelic entities like corporations and religion and government attach values, whether mercantile or moral, to both individual and classes of things. Commerce needs an algorhythm for identifying scarcities. Religion classifies (saved, unsaved; Catholic, Jane; us, them) for purposes often hardly less meretricious. “Cleanup on aisle three!” From Vegas to Valhalla we inhabit, as Nabakov wrote in Ada, “an evil and multicolored world.”
But we tell our stories because there is a campfire. And that’s what it’s all about, Alfie, the campfire. Which burns on against the uncomprehending wilderness around it.
Hey.
Got marshmallows, eh?
I got the beer, eh.
So Joe. Where you keeping your loose teeth, anyway? Under your pillow? Cheshire cat got your tongue?
Got blog?
Eh?
More, please?
Heh, yeah, I still got a few. But a couple have already turned to kidney stones.
Thanks, man. I'd blog up, but I'm wasted and I can't find my way home
Ew! Kidney stones! No connection, Joe.
And what da heck did Stevie MEAN by "leave your body alone", anyway? I can relate to the rest, but... what's your take on that?
Hey, you're welcome to blog up here?
I once went on a retreat in upstate NY; I think it was the holy ghost brothers who gave it. Anyway, in his opening talk, brother Tom, the leader, said “There will not be a quiz. If your mind wanders away from what I’m saying… follow that.”
He was an experienced old sage, of course. By the end of the weekend, we had begun finding, and lending each other, our glue. Some of it was melted marshamallow and didn’t last the night. But somehow we were warmed, brightened, and fed. Campfires are like that. Thanks for the fresh twigs, brother tree!
A woman just sent me a God story for the booklet I'm making. She said that on Christmas Eve she came by herself into our church for the first time, and felt so alone, felt so much pain from going through an awful divorce, and so achingly lonely. When our pastor walked up to her before our gathering to say hello, she just fell apart because someone had spoken to her. And he told her it was okay, she didn't have to speak. He just let her cry. She said it made her feel worthy.
"Say my name...you priest me."
Geez, Rick, What was YOUR day like?
Rick, there are tons of people saying your name,Rick.
You're kinda deep, aren'cha? And maybe....a little sensitive, Rick?
Hmmmm, just my thoughts.
feeties
I've looked at clams from both sides, now.
I really don't know clams.
At all.
Dip?
"What's in a name? Plenty!"
indeed
Post a Comment